Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

RSS FEED Subscribe Now!

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School
Other


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef
Panel Login

Question Number: 22788

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 2/1/2010

RE: Competive Adult

Mike Goodson of Milwaukee, WI USA asks...

Blue team has a free kick 25 meters from goal just off of the corner of the PA. At blue's request the red team's wall is moved back to the proper distance. During this process, a red defender and a blue attacker start hand checking, and positioning themselves in the opposite corner of the PA. The AR gets the CR's and players attention with a shout
that ends the positioning battle.

At the referee's whistle, the blue team kicks the ball, a single player from the red team's wall encroaches two steps, and is able to defect the kick. Simaltaneously, the blue attacker that was jostling for position moments before, elbows the red defender, who is tightly marking him, in the stomach. The CR is watching the goal area, and is able to spot the elbow clearly as it occurs.

The violent conduct is the more serious foul in this situation and must be dealt with, but should the restart be another free kick to blue? What would be the proper restart and cards issued in this situation?

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Referee Goodson
There are a number of factors to be taken into account on this one.
You state that it is violent conduct so that is a dismissal, a red card for the Blue attacker. I would also have to consider if the Red defender was guilty of any unsporting behaviour in the jostling and perhaps a caution might be appropriate as well.
The next decision the referee has to make is when did the incidents happen? Technically encroachment happens before the ball is in play and a retake would be the correct decision in law. The player that encroached may also have to be cautioned. However I don't believe that the retake is a good match control decision for the game and the Blues may not expect to get a retake when a player has been sent off for VC. If as you say they happened simultaneously then my decision might be to restart with a direct free kick from where the Blue Attacker committed the VC. That could be the 'best' decision as VC is a serious offence and when the ball is in play it should result in a DFK. In a match situation the focus of attention will be solely on the VC incident with probably other players getting involved in that area. There will be limited focus on the encroachment at two yards, probably only the referee saw it clearly along with perhaps the taker and it is easy to focus on the DFK from the spot where the VC happened. Also from a game control perspective the free kick to the defence gets the game restarted in a more open way with players moving back to their positions. That is an important consideration in what might be a heated situation.



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Answer provided by Referee Tom Stagliano

Referee Goodson

I agree 100% with Referee McHugh. This is a game critical moment. Your entire control of the remainder of this game may very well be determined by how you handle this case.

Violent conduct is in the opinion of the referee. Make certain you are not responding to the reaction in case the defender is "play-acting".

Given the jostling by those two players prior to the incident, I might reposition myself to be closer to them for the free kick. The CR should probably "add time" and jog over to those two players when the AR was yelling. It sounded to me like the CR looked over, glared and the jostling reduced. Being there is 80% of the battle. Let them know you care. Once they have to address the referee, they may forget about each other, if only for a moment.

As for the restart, it is a very tough sell to claim that the encroachment occurred before the jostling/elbowing incident. If you have to issue a caution or especially a dismissal to the attacker, then restart with a direct free kick for the defenders. Otherwise, you will just have more hot-blooded jostling and bad feelings if you try to restart with the original attacking free kick. This is a game critical moment, and how the referee manages this will determine a lot for player safety and enjoyment in the remainder of this game.



Read other questions answered by Referee Tom Stagliano

View Referee Tom Stagliano profile

Answer provided by Referee Dennis Wickham


The wise referee doesn't believe in simultaneous offenses.
Something big just happened, and must be stamped out for the good of the game. Deal with the striking and prevent a brawl. In the context of this match and this rare situation, the other offense is trifling - - it made no difference to the match.

In other matches and other situations, the encroachment may never again be trifling and will justify a caution and retake of the kick. But, not today.

Now. let's discuss the textbook answer. Since the encroachment occurred when the ball was out of play, the referee's decision to stop play (and not the whistle) decides that everything else happened while the ball was out of play. Caution the red defender. Sendoff the blue attacker. Retake the free kick for blue.

We are not textbooks.





Read other questions answered by Referee Dennis Wickham

View Referee Dennis Wickham profile

Answer provided by Referee Gene Nagy

Mike, there were basically two infractions: encroachment (or properly worded in the LOTG: failure to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a corner kick, free kick or throw-in) and violent conduct (VC). Both actions should be sanctioned.
I reason that because the free kick was not taken properly and the advantage that a free kick is supposed to grant did not happen, therefore the kick is retaken. Now since it is retaken it is established that there was misconduct and the caution is issued.
The VC also must be addressed. It is very important that the player is dealt with and of course it a send off and shown a red card for VC.
As an aside, send the player off first to avoid retaliation and then caution for encroachment. Lastly, set up the retake.



Read other questions answered by Referee Gene Nagy

View Referee Gene Nagy profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 22788
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Google
Web AskTheRef.com
Soccer Referee Extras


Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer


Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef





This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members.