Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

RSS FEED Subscribe Now!

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School
Other


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef
Panel Login

Question Number: 32418

Law 18 - Common Sense 5/1/2018

RE: 3 Adult

Michael Kopp of Orange, NSW Australia asks...

This question is a follow up to question 32390

My question is
A defender has passed the ball back deliberately to his keeper,the keeper goes to trap the ball with his feet,the ball hits his foot then rebounds and accidentally hits his hand which is out from his body,he then kicks the ball out of the goal box what is the ruling,I actually played on using the accidental hand ball law but after thinking about it I should have given a indirect do you agree

Answer provided by Referee Peter Grove

Hi Michael,
This is something that is not specifically covered in the Laws of the Game so I would say it is up to the referee to make a judgement call here. Given that hand and ball contact is one of the areas where the intent of the player is still to be considered and that the deliberate kick to the keeper also involves the matter of intent (although usually not for the keeper) I think I might be inclined to let a clearly unintentional contact to go unpunished in this situation.

However it would not be technically incorrect to call this as an offence. Your match, your decision, your reputation.



Read other questions answered by Referee Peter Grove

View Referee Peter Grove profile

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

Hi Michael,
given it was an accidental deflection and not say a swat to keep it out of the goal itself I see nothing wrong in allowing play to continue. You are well within the spirit of the game! The only consideration could be if an opponent was trying to challenge in pursuit and this handling prevented his opportunity.

Actually I suggested to the IFAB they remove the non use of the hands clause with ONLY if the keeper physically picks the ball up to grasp it & start his 6 seconds of uncontested possession is it an indfk, thus a one time knock punch or deflection would not matter. The original concept behind the 'passback' as it is universally misnamed, was not to stop the keepers use of hands but his ability to remove the ball from play by grabbing it so then the ball can not be challenged.
Cheers



Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson

View Referee Richard Dawson profile

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Michael
Reference is made in Law 5 to referees operating within the framework of the Laws of the Game and the *spirit of the game*. Referees are expected to use common sense and to apply the *spirit of the game* when applying the Laws of the Game,
So once the referee opines that as it is an unintentional, accidental contact on the hand common sense would suggest that it is not the offence of touching the ball with the hands after it has been deliberately kicked to the goalkeeper by a team-mate.
Indeed it might have to be a good spot to see the contact in the first place. In the situation where the goalkeeper swipes the ball away with his hand or directs it favourably then a different matter entirely and that is an offence.
So yes in my opinion it could be akin to the way we deal with deliberate handling. Penalising a goalkeeper for an accidental, unintentional touch on the ball after it bounces up of of a foot was never the intention of the law. I always go back to the reason that the law was introduced in the first place which was to prevent goalkeepers withholding the ball from challenge by an opponent. The ball was not withheld from challenge here and the best decision was the one you made. Perhaps on another day the circumstances might present differently and an IDFK would be correct call.
Have a look at this video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0kpSReuN2-E
The goalkeeper has used his arms and body to play the ball so the IDFK was entirely the correct decision. The GK seems to be protesting that the use of the hands did not happen or unintentional yet we can see that the arms did assist in playing the ball.





Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 32418
Read other Q & A regarding Law 18 - Common Sense

Google
Web AskTheRef.com
Soccer Referee Extras


Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer


Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef





This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members.