Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Panel Login

Question Number: 14906

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 2/26/2007

RE: competitive High School

Dan Wybo of London o, Onatrio Canada asks...

We used to have a indirect restart for the infraction of obstructing an opponent.
However obstruction can no longer be found anywhere in the rules.
it has been replaced by


"impedes the progress of an opponent"


Many coaches and even players still react to a play be calling REf ! Obstruction !

I explain that obstruction no longer exists as a indirect foul.

However, is obstruction the same as "impedes the progress of an opponent"


In other words when is it clear that the players progress has been impeded ?

Answer provided by Referee Chuck Fleischer

Yup Dan, obstruction went away in 1997. It was difficult to translate this word into many languages. The phrase "Impeding the progress of an opponent" works better. It means getting in the way so each language has something that covers that one.

When coaches yell "obstruction" they are displeased with an opponent holding one of their guys and we all know that is a load of kaka. Getting in the way still doesn't involve touching, it remains preventing an opposing player from freely moving on the park.

Tell them FIFA has it in writing, somewhere, obstruction no longer exists and you can't call it any more. That usually quiets them until they figure out you're having them off.

Regards,



Read other questions answered by Referee Chuck Fleischer

View Referee Chuck Fleischer profile

Answer provided by Referee Nathan Lacy

Ref Fleischer is right on the mark. The only addition I would make to his statements is that the impeding should be a deliberate act by the opponent. By that I mean that the opponent should have actively and knowingly made an effort to get in the way of the player as to keep them from having a reasonable play on the ball. If the normal sequence of events results in a player ending up in the way OR the player is simply standing in place which ends up being in the way then this does NOT constitute impeding. Of course each event must be judged on its own merit and you, as the referee, have the final say. All the best,



Read other questions answered by Referee Nathan Lacy

View Referee Nathan Lacy profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 14906
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef


This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site ar

e welcomed! <>