- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 16321Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 8/15/2007RE: Rec Adult Geoffrey of Laguna Beach, CA USA asks...This question is a follow up to question 16281 The question stated that in the opinion of the referee the actions of the player caused the bobble. The responses covered valid goal, double touches, unsporting behavior and playing in a dangerous manner. Why not interfering with the goalkeeper's release of the ball? If the player's actions caused the goalkeeper to bobble the ball, one possible interpretation is the goalkeeper had possession and then lost possession due to the actions of the player. I do realize one had to be there to see what happened and numerous interpretations based on the question are possible. Without being there, it seemed to me that valid goal, playing in a dangerous manner, unsporting behavior, and interfering with goalkeeper release were the decision set the referee had to quickly choose from to determine the proper restart of play. Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol I don't think any of us looked at the play that way. If the ball was clearly in the goalkeeper's possession, then any action of the opponent that led to the ball being bobbled would indeed be interfering with the keeper.
However the original question [16281] says the ball bounced off the goalpost. I think we on the panel thought this meant a mad scramble for an open ball. The goalkeeper then bobbled the ball because she was flustered with the PK kicker nearby. There would be nothing wrong in that scenario, as long as the kicker didn't actually touch the ball before any other player.
A good example of why you had to be there, though. Thanks for writing.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profileAnswer provided by Referee Chuck Fleischer Interfering with the goalkeeper's release of the ball never entered my mind because she wasn't trying to release it she was trying to gain control.
I don't believe any referee should take the opinion an opponent is interfering with a release if the keeper has not yet gained possession of the ball.
Regards,
Read other questions answered by Referee Chuck Fleischer
View Referee Chuck Fleischer profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 16321
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site ar
e welcomed! <>
|