- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 16937Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 9/27/2007RE: competive Adult Doug Woods of Oceanside, CA USA asks...This question is a follow up to question 16891 I was told that a deliberate handling of the ball must be called, and the advantage rule did not apply. Was I misinformed? Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson YES you were very badly misinformed! Pray tell which genuis offered you that tasty mythological tidbit? Not I hope anyone who actually instructs referees? Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Keith Contarino Yes you were misinformed. Hopefully this was NOT by a referee. Deliberately handling the ball is a foul under Law 12 and ALL fouls under Law 12 are subject to advantage.
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profileAnswer provided by Referee Michelle Maloney A deliberate handling of the ball should be called - unless allowing advantage would benefit the team who did not do the handling. In that case, the referee can wait 2-3 seconds to see if the advantage is realized. If not, whistle and return to the spot where the ball was handled and give a direct free kick - possibly with a caution, depending on the referee's opinion of why it was handled and how blatantly.
Read other questions answered by Referee Michelle Maloney
View Referee Michelle Maloney profileAnswer provided by Referee Chuck Fleischer You're getting some bum scoop there Doug. The referee should intervene on this direct free kick offence unless his doing so would do as the defence intended, break up the other side's play. That's called playing advantage and when utilized by the referee he has 2-3 seconds of limbo to see if what he thought would happen by his not stopping play does happen.
Regards,
Read other questions answered by Referee Chuck Fleischer
View Referee Chuck Fleischer profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 16937
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site ar
e welcomed! <>
|