- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 15093Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 4/1/2007RE: Recreational/Competitive Under 16 Diane Mousouliotis of Mission, B. C. , B. C. Canada asks...Law 12, Decision 2, states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hand or arms. Possession of the ball includes the goalkeeper deliberately parrying the ball, but does not include the circumstances where, in the opinion of the referee, the ball rebounds accidentally from the goalkeeper, for example after he has made a save."
I recently refereed a tournament match where the goalkeeper, after a couple of rebounds and the ball rolling on the line beside her, got her hand on the top of the ball and the opponent, standing near, kicked/tapped the ball in. The team was disturbed that I allowed the goal, as they insisted the goalie had her hand on the ball, even just a finger, therefore the opponent could not kick the ball in. I do not find a definitive law stating this, and I ask for your guidance. What is the purpose of Decision 2 of Law 12, and how does it apply to Goalie control or possession with respect to the opponents' ability to challenge? thanks
Answer provided by Referee Keith Contarino I'm afraid, if things happened as you say, you made an error. If a keeper has her hand on top of the ball and the ball is on the ground, she has possession of it and may not be challenged and the ball may not be kicked.
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Diane, it is a reality that the keeper position is one that takes the safe out of safety when it is expected to throw oneself into the feet of an oncoming opponent and use the face and hands to keep the ball out of his /her goal! Possession was granted in the keeper's favor because of the risk of injury by allowing players to kick away while the fingers, hand or arm was in contact with the ball.
If the arm hand or finger is in contact with the ball it CANNOT be played by an opponent. The opponent must pull away from the challenge otherwise it could be a DFK foul of kicking or attempting to kick.
If you note the phrase "touching it with any part of his hand or arms" refers exactly to this incident. You were correct initially to allow play, up until the keeper got her hand on top of the ball. Then the opposition must not challenge! AND more importantly you as referee must not allow them to or get away with doing so if they do! It is prudent to wait as a striker as the ball can pop free and if so is legal to play. But the ball must be dropped by the keeper or rebound AWAY on its own, NOT with the aid of the striker giving it a wee nudge or vicious swing kick or running the keeper over as in a charge. There are those moments when hand and foot will arrive at the ball at the same time where it will be a difficult decision whether to award a goal or award an DFK out. The ball could be fumbled and dropped and a leg swing catch the keeper in the head as the striker tries to pounce on what is technically a loose ball even if but 1/2 inch away from the outstretched arms of the keeper. As I said the position has it risks but we must be vigilant to protect the keeper from unfair knocks that try to pop free a controled posession of the ball even if it be a finger resting on the ball! Yes the team disturbed was correct although I dislike the dissent, I understand the frustration as I to coach
As referee it was your decision that although in error was in fact a decision based as a fact of play so it stands as a goal! No sense in beating yourself up, you can learn from this, use the knowledge in following matches and ensure other referee's are similarly informed as you now are! Next time DFK out ok? Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Ben Mueller Possession includes 1 finger controlling ball between ball and ground. Without seeing the incident, it is hard to comment.
Read other questions answered by Referee Ben Mueller
View Referee Ben Mueller profileAnswer provided by Referee Steve Montanino Whoops. From what I see here you most likely got this one wrong, but don't fret. There is always next time, though it won't make the goalkeeper or their team happy.
Just remember one finger = possession, but use your judgement, you can't referee entirely by a book.
Read other questions answered by Referee Steve Montanino
View Referee Steve Montanino profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 15093
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 31792
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|