Question Number: 17923

Mechanics 11/15/2007

RE: Rec Under 17

Daniel of vienna, va usa asks...

Well, I was wondering what your opinion of the Taylor Twellman goal against the Chicago Fire...

To me it was a bicycle kick but a dangerous high kick. I mean the defensive guy was right there, and for his safety he just got out of the way... maybe a judgement call as are a lot of things, but I think calls against dangerous high kicks should be enforced.

Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol

One consideration in judging such a close play made by the pros is that they generally have much better control over themselves, and both teammates and opponents have a much better idea of how plays are about to develop. Every year or two a new picture gets posted around on websites, usually with a foot contacting a ball a few inches from someone else's nose, titled, "Was this Dangerous Play?" It was not dangerous at that high level of game, simply because the players are so good. Owners of both the boot and the nose knew exactly where the other one was. It is a foul (IFK restart) only when an opponent must cease from play to avoid the dangerous situation. Most times both players are quite content with the situation they have put themselves in, so no call is needed.

Answer provided by Referee Keith Contarino

I've watched this replay at least 10 times and for the life of me cannot see what the problem is. Perhaps if I'd have seen it live I'd feel differently but I didn'e see any opponent disadvantaged by what was a spectacular kick.

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

At that level always a goal! Notice later when he trys it again and is leveled no call there either! Still can be legally charged doing the bike!
cheers