- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 20387League Specific 10/27/2008RE: High School Val Garza of Cathedral City, CA USA asks...This question is a follow up to question 20359 The writer seems to indicate that the same player took the third kick from the penalty mark, even after he was cautioned. Being high school soccer, should he not have been replaced after being shown the yellow card? This seems like a protestable action, if it was indeed the case. Answer provided by Referee MrRef QUOTE NFHS rules 9-1-3 ? A second whistle is required to restart play for the taking of a penalty kick so requiring a re-kick because of no whistle was proper. The referee could have cautioned the player when the first kick was made without a whistle, but should have at least warned the kicker that a second kick without a whistle would result in a disqualification for 12-8-2a ? An act where a player prohibits a timely restart of the game. Under sample tournament progression, B-2-a, if a player is disqualified before the kick is completed, a substitute is permitted. The player should not have been allowed another attempt. Since the referee below cautioned the player rather than disqualifying the player, the player should not have been permitted to take the kick but a substitute should have been permitted ? Tournament progression B-1-b The referee was, therefore, incorrect under NFHS rules. However, please remember that the rules do permit the state to adopt other tournament progression rules so that the above would be in effect only if the state has adopted the Sample Tournament Progress as indicated in the NFHS Rules. Concerning a protest, as indicated in Rule 5-1-2 ? Protests of NFHS rules are not recognized. The officials can only correct a decision so long as the game has not been started (or until their jurisdiction ends ? we need to add this). The jurisdiction of the officials ends with their leaving the field of play and its immediate surroundings. Once the officials left the playing area and its immediate surroundings, no protest of the decision made by the referee is possible.
Read other questions answered by Referee MrRef
View Referee MrRef profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 20387
Read other Q & A regarding League Specific
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|