- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 24305Law 16 - Goal Kick 11/11/2010RE: Rec Under 11 Ros Bregozzo of Irvine, California USA asks... I was an AR in a game when on a goal kick the player kicked the ball. It traveled a short distance within the penalty area and he followed and kicked it again out of the area. The referee awarded an IFK for kicking the ball twice I suppose, but since it had not left the area I thought the ball was not in play after the first kick and the goal kick should have been retaken. What is the correct call or restart for this? Thanks Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Ros As the ball has not left the penalty area the ball is not in play and as such a double touch violation is not possible. The correct decision was a retake of the goal kick. An AR in this situation should alert the referee that the ball had in fact not left the goal area particularly if there was any doubt.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Dennis Wickham Your understanding is correct. The ball is not in play until it leaves the penalty area on a goal kick. If any player touches the ball before it leaves, the goal kick is retaken. A second touch infringement (and IFK restart) would be the right call only if the kicker touched it a second time AFTER the ball left the penalty area and before any other player touched the ball. I agree with Ref McHugh. The AR should get the referee's attention and help avoid a misapplication of the laws before allowing an incorrect restart to proceed. The AR should provide the additional information (quietly and privately) but changing the call remains for the referee to decide.
Read other questions answered by Referee Dennis Wickham
View Referee Dennis Wickham profileAnswer provided by Referee Gary Voshol Probably just a temporary lapse by the referee. The AR should tell him that the ball wasn't in play. This happened in a game several years back, and as the kicker is approaching the ball for a second touch, I'm thinking, 'If he touches it, is it a retake or an IFK?' It was resolved for me because another player got to the ball first, so I knew it was a retake. But at the moment I couldn't remember if the second-touch trumped or not. I looked it up when I got home.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 24305
Read other Q & A regarding Law 16 - Goal Kick The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 24744
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|