- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 25138Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 6/26/2011Nick Broderick of St. John's, Newfoundland Canada asks...There was an interesting incident that caught my attention during a FIFA U17 WC match on Saturday between Canada and Rwanda. A Canadian player was about to take a throw-in about halfway into the Rwandan half. A Rwandan player was standing what appeared to be three from the thrower. As the ball was delivered, the Rwandan defender jumped in an attempt to block the delivery. The referee stopped play and awarded an indirect free kick to the Canadian team from where the Rwandan player stood and the defender received no sanction. Assume for a moment that the Rwandan defender did, in fact, fail to respect the required two yard distance. (The referee believed it to be so, else why would he intervene?) I'm 99.999...% sure this is wrong: the defender should be cautioned for failing to respect the required distance and the throw-in retaken, no? Please confirm that I am not the one succumbing to myths! And secondly, if this is the correct course of action, where do so many referees get the idea that infringing the required distance should result in an indirect free kick to the thrower's team? I've even heard instructors teaching this (and, it appears, so did the fledgling FIFA referee in charge of this WC match.) Answer provided by Referee Gene Nagy Nick, sadly I didn't see the game but Law 15 requires refs to caution a player found guilty of distracting the thrower. In the back of the book, under ADVICE you will see that the restart is a retake of the throw-in. It would appear that the ref erred twice; once in not giving a mandatory caution and incorrect restart.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gene Nagy
View Referee Gene Nagy profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Nick A common enough error by a referee. I had to point this out to a colleague recently in a game that the restart is a throw in. The correct decision is a caution and a retake of the throw in.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 25138
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 25149 See Question: 25150
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|