Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 25138

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 6/26/2011

Nick Broderick of St. John's, Newfoundland Canada asks...

There was an interesting incident that caught my attention during a FIFA U17 WC match on Saturday between Canada and Rwanda. A Canadian player was about to take a throw-in about halfway into the Rwandan half. A Rwandan player was standing what appeared to be three from the thrower. As the ball was delivered, the Rwandan defender jumped in an attempt to block the delivery. The referee stopped play and awarded an indirect free kick to the Canadian team from where the Rwandan player stood and the defender received no sanction.

Assume for a moment that the Rwandan defender did, in fact, fail to respect the required two yard distance. (The referee believed it to be so, else why would he intervene?) I'm 99.999...% sure this is wrong: the defender should be cautioned for failing to respect the required distance and the throw-in retaken, no? Please confirm that I am not the one succumbing to myths! And secondly, if this is the correct course of action, where do so many referees get the idea that infringing the required distance should result in an indirect free kick to the thrower's team? I've even heard instructors teaching this (and, it appears, so did the fledgling FIFA referee in charge of this WC match.)

Answer provided by Referee Gene Nagy

Nick, sadly I didn't see the game but Law 15 requires refs to caution a player found guilty of distracting the thrower. In the back of the book, under ADVICE you will see that the restart is a retake of the throw-in.
It would appear that the ref erred twice; once in not giving a mandatory caution and incorrect restart.



Read other questions answered by Referee Gene Nagy

View Referee Gene Nagy profile

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Nick
A common enough error by a referee. I had to point this out to a colleague recently in a game that the restart is a throw in. The correct decision is a caution and a retake of the throw in.



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 25138
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...

See Question: 25149

See Question: 25150

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>