- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 25951Mechanics 2/5/2012RE: Adult Steven Baskett of Sydney, NSW Australia asks...If a referee applies advantage to a foul , then later he when plays stopped he issues a yellow and its the players second yellow can he then show a red ? Or would you advise to just stop it if its his second yellow. Ive never seen this happen or done it just was wondering .. Answer provided by Referee Jason Wright Hi Steven, Applying advantage after a cautionable offence should be done very sparingly. The ball has a nasty habit of stayin in play for a long time after such an offence, meaning by the time you do caution the player, nobody remembers what it was for! Either that or you run the risk of an incident of some description happening that leaves you reluctant to issue the card, or even the risk of that player committing a 2nd cautionable offence during this period (in this case you would show both yellow cards, and the red). In short, there are a number of things that can go very wrong here, so I'd only allow play to continue if stopping play would greatly disadvantage the opposition. For a 2nd cautionable offence, I'd treat it no differently to determining whether to apply advantage from a straight red card. Aside from the above considerations, could you imagine if that player scores a goal, or even stops one, while you're waiting for play to go out? I'm sure you could envision how that would look, having to send him off. As such, I'd only consider allowing play to continue from a red card offence (including a 2nd cautionable offence) if the opposing team essentially hass an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Anything else just gets too risky.
Read other questions answered by Referee Jason Wright
View Referee Jason Wright profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Steven Under the Laws of the Game the referee is allowed to play advantage and to then go back to caution the player at the next stoppage. If it is his second caution, as you know, it is a dismissal. That is the Law yet we know in practise that referees rarely do that. The reason is that it will be perceived to be harsh to send off a player for an offence that ended up as an advantage with play continuing perhaps for some time. An example would be a deliberate handling where the player tries to stop the ball with his hand but fails to do so and the referee plays advantage. At the next stoppage is the referee going to send off the player for a 2nd caution. Many time he will probably warn the player. If he was not cautioned there is every possibility that he will be cautioned. My advice is that when a player is going to be sent off to not play advantage unless it is an immediate goal scoring opportunity. That eliminates many problems that can arise and everyone can relate the sanction to the incident.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Dennis Wickham It is always advisable to stop play and not allow advantage where the sendoff event is for an act of violence - - the risk of retaliation (or a brawl) while the advantage is played out is too great. But, for things that are just going to be a caution (even a second caution), the referee has to make a judgment. Some players are going to be very dangerous when they know they are going to be sent off at the next stoppage in play; others are not. By observing the players, the referee can decide whether for this player, allowing the advantage is worth the risk.
Read other questions answered by Referee Dennis Wickham
View Referee Dennis Wickham profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 25951
Read other Q & A regarding Mechanics
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|