- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 26347Law 5 - The Referee 5/17/2012RE: Rec Under 18 Larry of Newburgh, NY Orange asks...Concerning the advantage call...Blue player is running along the touch line toward the Red goal line. 30 yds from the goal line, a Red defendeer runnning alongside the Blue player tries to tackle the Blue player. He misses the ball,but the action causes the Blue player to stumble a little before continuing on to cross the ball toward the Red goal where it is plucked from the air by the keeper. Is the attempted trip deserving of an advantage call or a no call? Could it be considered an attempt to trip and so be treated as a foul? I have been shouting advantage for these plays but recently another Ref says there is nothing there so why am I calling for an advantage! Any comments? Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Larry When a foul has been committed the referee allows play to continue when the team against which an offence has been committed will benefit from such an advantage. Now the question the referee has to ask is whether there is a foul in the 1st place. Only the referee can make that call and there will be times when there is a 'trifling' foul that has little or no effect on play in which case signalling advantage is not required nor is it advisable. Only signal advantage on clear breaches of the Law. As you know an attempt to trip is a foul so if a referee believes that the attempt caused the attacker to stumble effecting the play then it is a foul. If the referee believe that allowing the player to continue through the use of advantage then it is correct to do so. Where a referee can get into difficulties on this is where the foul is trifling and the advantage has been realised but the player then wastes the opportunity by giving the ball away. The team can then complain that advantage has not materialised and it looks for the free kick.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Gary Voshol Advantage is played when there is a foul and the referee believes the fouled team would be better off if play did not stop. If there is no foul or is only a trifling foul, you do not invoke advantage - no signal, no shout-out of 'Play On' or 'Advantage'. You may wish to say something or make some motion so the players know you saw the action - 'Not a foul.' Some refs say 'Nothing', but I avoid that - there was something there, or you wouldn't be addressing it. Attempting to trip is a foul, so you can invoke advantage. However in most cases when the attempt fails, the foul if any is trifling and you wouldn't need to call or signal anything. When you see trifling fouls, it is sometimes a benefit have a quiet word with the fouled party - 'I see what's going on down there in the corner. You're working through it. If he ever does get you, I'll call the foul.' This can diffuse bad feelings that may arise.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profileAnswer provided by Referee Keith Contarino I'd add that in your scenario, even if you decide the trip was a foul, where's the advantage? You said the ball was crossed toward the goal and was plucked by the opposing keeper. When we think of advantage we think of the opportunity to mount or continue an attack or a shot on goal. None of that happened here. Bring the ball back and give the free kick although from your description, it's doubtful there was a foul in the first place
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 26347
Read other Q & A regarding Law 5 - The Referee The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 26392
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|