- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 28867League Specific 10/20/2014RE: Adult Steve of Maidstone, Kent UK asks...I'm interested to know your opinions on whether a red card was the correct decision on Saturday when he Spurs player Fazio pulled Aguero back in the area while Nevas still has the ball. Whils the ball did subsequently come across the area and Aguero would have very likely scored. There was no guarantee this would happen at the time the offence was committed. A definite penalty but a red car too? Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Steve It was an interesting decision and the referee was entitled to interpret that had Aguero not been pulled back he would have had a goal scoring opportunity. As that potential opportunity was denied the correct decision is a red card. Okay there is an element of interpretation of what would have happened without the foul. I recall on BBCs Question of Sport there was a question round where a video was stopped and the participants had to describe what happened next. If the video was stopped just before the foul there is every likelihood that the answer would be that the ball was passed into the goal area to Aguero who would have tapped the ball home. That is not an unreasonable assumption and a very high probability of occurring hence the red card. I also believe that was interpretation of Fazio as well as he knew that without the foul there was every chance of a goal.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Dennis Wickham It presents an interesting challenge for the referee. The 'big picture' is fairly certain, if there had not been a foul, would there have been an obvious goal scoring opportunity. That depends on a 'small picture question: would he have been able to gain control of the ball?
Read other questions answered by Referee Dennis Wickham
View Referee Dennis Wickham profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Steve, it was correct because (a)it was the referee's decision as a fact of play (b) it was upheld by the league who could choose not to in the review ITOOTR will always put some doubt into any close decision, however, as my colleagues Ref Wickham and McHugh sagely point out, the full picture is often a composite of smaller ones! Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 28867
Read other Q & A regarding League Specific
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|