- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 28887Law 18 - Common Sense 10/21/2014RE: Competitive Adult Jack Smith of Sydney, NSW Australia asks...I was linked to a strange incident on Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTkbdTj8eLY). In the video, it appears that a defender is cautioned for unsporting behaviour / delaying the restart of play for clearing the ball too hard (while it is in play). Unfortunately for the player, it is his second caution and he is then sent-off for receiving a second caution in the same match. Is the referee within his rights to caution a player for doing this - if not, would this be a misapplication of the Laws of the Game and grounds for a replay, or simply a decision regarding facts connected with play? Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Jack The video shows the ball being kicked over a high fence for a throw in to the attacking team. On the face of this it should never have been a caution. Simply add on the lost time. However I am always wary of looking at incidents on video in isolation and without the full facts. The ground is surrounded by high fencing obviously to prevent this happening yet the player goes out of his way to kick the ball over that in what I understand was the 87th minute. Did the player acts in a manner which showed a lack of respect for the game? Would it make any difference if that was done multiple times by the same player and was already warned by the referee not to do it? What if the balls were not readily retrievable and play had already been delayed multiple times? Did the player shout something? Was there a previous incident and the referee was waiting for a stoppage to caution? The referee has the powers to caution for USB for any acts that in his opinion do not respect the game so there is no misapplication of the Laws nor grounds for an appeal. The caution might get rescinded but that does not change the fact on the day. Generally such acts are not cautioned and that is why the referee's action had made the internet. The referee uses other powers such as adding on time for the time lost in retrieving the ball in these situations. I also think that this is poor play by Whites anyway to kick the ball back towards its own goal putting pressure on the defender. If we exclude the caution part Whites have invited Purple on some 40 yards down field for an attacking throw in in a dangerous position. If Whites are putting it out of play do so in the other half. Also why does White 4 get involved with the AR plus Whites goalkeeper can count himself lucky he is not walking either for his push on the referee
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Jason Wright Hi Jack, This type of incident has been discussed at length on refereeing forums. Most referees agree that while the ball is in play, the players are free to kick it as hard as they like, even if it's just to clear it out. Some said there may be some extreme cases (such as the low-level match with one ball, where the ball is in the corner with nobody around and the player has clearly tried to lose the ball in the creek), but even those are dubious. As for this one, I can't see any possible way you could say the manner in which he kicked the ball out was unsporting. It actually looked fairly regular to me. Given the ball was in the air and the player was under some pressure, I don't have a problem with the manner of the kick. But, as Ref McHugh said, are we missing some of the story? One possibility may be that the card wasn't for that kick, but an earlier incident in play from which advantage was played. Incidentally, I'm also rather concerned at the fact that the goalkeeper pushed the referee.
Read other questions answered by Referee Jason Wright
View Referee Jason Wright profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Jack, interesting like Paul Harvey on the old radio show and now, for the rest of the story! I guess we take the header on the video at face value . I could not tell if that was an attack off a pass forward or a defensive clearance from a bad pass back? I did not see an offside flag up as I wondered if the referee HAD blown the whistle and the player was reacting by blasting the ball out. I rarely dispute a referee's decision when the circumstances to me are unknown and it is his match his decision his reputation. If it was a defensive clearance, given the way that pass, if you could call it that, was hammered back to him, forcing him to give chase and then pound it out of play, is really weird? I too was wondering at the push by the keeper which was not challenged at all by the referee that I could see. But as a general rule no, we do not caution for a ball driven out of play for a throw in or a goal kick. If we need to add time to retrieve the ball then hopefully the league allows for it but often match schedules on fields is tight so, it MAY BE this player was warned earlier and the surrounding fence area is a local bylaw where it is requested not to blow the ball out forcefully but we are grasping at straws here. There are umpteen reasons for a caution to be awarded as my colleague Ref McHugh sagely points out. Perhaps the referee thought the ball was blasted at his AR who sort of ducks a bit. One would need to read the referee report as to what actions were taken and why to truly have an idea if there is cause for concern. It could likely stand as a fact of play even if the league overturned the send off on appeal but who knows what an individual league or association might decided on their own idea of what is fair or within the LOTG! Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 28887
Read other Q & A regarding Law 18 - Common Sense
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|