- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 29150Law 10 - Method of Scoring 2/1/2015RE: Under 8 Kris Chesworth of Crewe, Uk asks...During a penalty shootout one of our players hit the underside of the bar, the ball bounced down (not over the line) but then hit the keeper and went in. Should the penalty be a goal or not? Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol Yes, it should count. From the Laws of the Game: 'When a penalty kick is taken during the normal course of play, or time has been extended at half-time or full time to allow a penalty kick to be taken or retaken, a goal is awarded if, before passing between the goalposts and under the crossbar: • the ball touches either or both of the goalposts and/or the crossbar and/or the goalkeeper' And as procedures for a penalty kick apply to kicks from the penalty mark, the above section applies. You reference an Under 8 game - why do we need a 'shootout' to determine a winner in U8? In my area, we don't even report the scores for U8. Whether or not your referee got this decision right, I can see why a referee assigned to that age level would not know all the procedures for kicks from the penalty mark - he or she may never have administered one before.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Kris, u-8 PK shoot out? Seems a tad unusual for that age group but as REF Voshol has correctly pointed out, provided the referee had not blown his whistle early, and there were no infractions by the attacking team at the taking of the PK, the goal should count. Cheers links to 2 very unusual but legal pk goals http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=strange+penalty+kick+goal+&FORM=VIRE2#view=detail&mid=0EDDC2CD993BD33DDFD30EDDC2CD993BD33DDFD3 http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=strange+penalty+kick+goal+&FORM=VIRE5#view=detail&mid=B8169B4D5DBF32C96C50B8169B4D5DBF32C96C50
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Kris Frequent visitors to the site will note that this question is asked regularly. The correct decision is that a goal must be awarded so the referee was 100% correct in his application of the Law. The relevant section of the Law 14 states **When a penalty kick is taken during the normal course of play, or time has been extended at half-time or full time to allow a penalty kick to be taken or retaken, a goal is awarded if, before passing between the goalposts and under the crossbar: # the ball touches either or both of the goalposts and/or the crossbar and/or the goalkeeper The referee decides when a penalty kick has been completed** The same law 14 applies to kicks from the penalty mark. So the ball can hit any combination of post, crossbar, goalkeeper, ground with the referee waiting for the momentum of the original kick to end and a goal is awarded if it cross the goal line into the goal. Obviously it cannot touch the kicker for a second time in which case the ball is called dead. For those interested in the history of the game this ruling goes way back. In 1986 a French player did just this in a penalty shoot out in a WC game between Brazil and France. The ball hit the crossbar and the ball came back out and hit the Brazilian goalkeeper and went into the goal. The Referee allowed the goal to count on the day and France went on to win 4-3 on penalties. There was a lot of controversy about the French penalty kick at the time due to a wording ambiguity in the law on when a penalty was completed. The Scottish Football Association, as a member of IFAB, sought clarification at the next AGM and it was agreed at the time that the referee's decision was correct and the wording changed to remove the ambiguity. In the great rewrite of the Laws of the Game in 97/98 all that 1987 re-wording was expunged and the current wording which continues to reflects that original historic incident. BTW the referee on the day back in 1986 got it correct based on what he understood was the only possible outcome which was the ball was kicked and the momentum of the ball from the original kick carried the ball over the line. It just happened to hit the post and the goalkeeper to get there.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 29150
Read other Q & A regarding Law 10 - Method of Scoring
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|