Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 30008

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 1/2/2016

RE: Competitive Under 17

Edy of Houston, Texas USA asks...

An attacker fairly charges a defender,but neither player is within playing distance of the ball. The reffere should do what?

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Edy
That is an illegal charge punished by a direct free kick from where the offence took place. Is it called very often? No as if the charge is executed in the normal fair manner it can be seen as jostling with perhaps little impact on play. The charges that are always punished are the ones to the back and chest areas.
As an aside the former ATRs had this as an indirect free kick offence which was a legacy of former laws.



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

Hi Ed,
technically you cannot fairly charge an opponent if the ball is not playable. This is a foul of charging or holding, pushing etc... If the force used is considerable and the points of contact are transparently illegal a referee will call the foul as a DFK with cards as an option!

It is conceivable that two opposing players are in pursuit of the ball or seeking to run into an attacking position and the other a defending one as such they clash in what could be construed as equal 50/50 contact where both are guilty of a simultaneous foul that gets rejected as trifling or doubtful by the referee.
To be impeded which is an INDFK offence there should be no physical or very minor contact . Impeding is a infraction we rarely see called correctly anymore!
Cheers



Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson

View Referee Richard Dawson profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 30008
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>