Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 30365

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 4/29/2016

RE: Competive High School

Brandon Olson of Ephraim, UT USA asks...

This question is a follow up to question 21474

My son and the goalie approached the pass and reached the ball simultaneously. The ball didn't seem to ever be in possession by either, but a yellow card was given to my son as the Goalie flopped to the ground.
What are the rules for a player to charge a ball passed to him in the box and when is the GK considered in possession?

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Brandon
This question gets asked regularly. When challenging for the ball the goalkeeper is considered like any other player with the exception that he can uses his hands inside the penalty area. The GK is considered to be in possession of the ball when trapped by either or both hands or when bouncing it to the ground or when releasing it. In FIFA games a hand on top of the ball on the ground is also possession. While in possession a GK cannot be challenged.
Now we know that goalkeeping can have its dangers when GKs dive at the feet of opponents. Referees have to judge how much the risk is caused by the GK and how much by the attacker. Sometimes it is just a coming together while at the other end of the scale it is a no hope lunge by the attacker / goalkeeper knowing that there is little hope of winning the ball without risk to the opponent. That is a foul.
Referees also take into account the manner of the challenge. A GK might slide sideways towards the ball and the opponents stretches out a leg, foot first to try to win the ball. That runs the high risk of inevitable contact of leg, foot into the GKs torso. I had one of these recently and I went against the attacker. The GK rolled around injured although my gut feeling was that it was not serious as both players had almost stopped at the point of contact. I also went with a caution as I felt it was bordering on risky with limited chance of the forward winning the ball. The GKs team felt it was a dangerous risky challenge appealing for all sorts of sanction. The player said that the ball was there to be won yet it was the manner of trying to win the ball that was at issue not possession or lack thereof. The caution was adequate IMO and sometimes it is what I call a *keep a lid on it* sanction.
I also had one earlier in the season where I clearly saw the attacker play the ball first on a stretch and the GK landed late on the attackers leg hurting himself. I awarded the goal and got the GK treated for the injury which was of his own making. Indeed the GKs action was a foul on the attacker yet advantage was the correct decision. I left it at that.
Player in some situations can be somewhat unlucky to pick up a caution yet to not do so may raise tempers, lose some control etc. The player also then has to adjust his challenging style on other tackles which is the main purpose of the card.
BTW the caution can also be for a series of fouls (PI), or not heeding a referee warning to not make any more challenges involving risk, after getting the benefit of doubt on a previous tackle. If I say to a player to not come to my attention again I expect him to heed that advice.





Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Answer provided by Referee Joe Manjone

Brandon,
The goalkeeper does not have to be in possession of the ball to be penalized as is indicated by NFHS Rule 12-4-2: 'A player shall not in any manner charge the goalkeeper in the penalty area unless the goalkeeper is obstructing the player or dribbling the ball with the feet.' Also, Rule 12-4-2a indicates that: 'An official shall disqualify without caution, any player who flagrantly fouls the goalkeeper in possession of the ball. Possession includes when the goalkeeper has the ball trapped by either or both hands or when bouncing it to the ground or releasing the ball into play.' From your description, it sounds as if both your son and the goalkeeper were playing the ball which would not result in a caution. However, the referee obviously did not view the contact in this manner. Hopefully, this helps in your understanding of goalkeeper contact and your son's team has a very successful season.



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe Manjone

View Referee Joe Manjone profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 30365
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>