- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 30666Kicks From The Penalty mark 8/13/2016RE: REC Adult russell of Sydney, Australia asks...Keepers moving off the line at Penalties should be booked. So says the esteemed Uefa chief refereeing officer, Pierluigi Collina. To quote him... 'Goalkeepers who move forward off their line when a penalty is taken must be given yellow cards and spot-kicks retaken even during a shootout.' If this was in place for todays KFPM in the Brazil v Australia Olympic Quarter Final - the brazil an keeper would have bee sent off after the second penalty taken by the Australian's. Of course, the yellow card scenario suggested by Collina is not in place, however, surely the CR and AR should have had a 'word' to the Brazilian keeper. One can only wonder what might have been if they did. (one can also only wonder what might have been if the Aussies converted after the Mata miss / Williams save). Speaking of penalties, keen on the panels thoughts regarding the penalty shout 2-3 minutes before the end of regulation time. And yes, clearly, I am a disappointed Aussie Matilda's supporter. Russell Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Russell The perennial problem of goalkeeper encroachment. Now IFAB has CHANGED Law 14 in that, so as PierLuigi Collina states, a goalkeeper is now cautioned for encroachment and a retake. Now the Law only requires that the goalkeeper is cautioned on a retake not a scored penalty. So as all the Australian penalties were scored up until the last penalty there was no issue and no cautions. Now interestingly the one that was missed had the least amount of encroachment by the Brazilian goalkeeper. As regards the penalty call I did not see the game and highlights are very limited. The only video I saw did not show any penalty claim which might suggest that it was questionable?
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 30666
Read other Q & A regarding Kicks From The Penalty mark
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|