Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 30979

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 10/30/2016

Jandourek of Liberec, Czech Republic Czech Republic asks...

Hi,

my question is about fouls inside the penalty area. When is it promising attack (yellow card) and when not (without yellow card)? Is eventually any change because of new DOGSO fouls assessments? (I mean yellow card for DOGSO inside the box).

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi

It is left to the referee to decide was is promising or what is not. It is what it says. Is the attack promising in setting up a goal scoring chance which can include numerical superiority, position on the field of play etc.
IFAB the law maker has changed the law in respect of denying a goal scoring opportunity. Now if an opponent makes a genuine attempt to play the ball and it results in a penalty kick the disciplinary sanction will be a caution not a dismissal in a normal DOGSO situation. If however it does not involve a genuine attempt such as a pull back, jersey pull, deliberate handling or a push or it does not result in a penalty kick the referee will still send the player off for a DOGSO.



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

Hi Jandourek,
interestingly FIFA has asked us to consider the INTENT of the players action a vast difference from the previous protocols where you added up the criteria and if it was met, off you go. The idea that a player who makes a legitimate challenge for the ball but creates a foul versus a player who simply tactically eliminates the scoring threat with out worrying about the ball in any way is new!

Personally I rather like the concept that a PK is in fact the scoring opportunity has me wondering why not delay showing the card until after the PK is taken if it is just for DOGSO not a SFP or VC . IF scored show the yellow if missed show the red ! lol Plus I really dislike the DOGSO for handling given so many incidents are NOT deliberate fouls. They NEED to be blatant beyond question not a ball arm fuzzy maybe. The fact that holding fouls are continuous foul and we apply advantage if they get into the PA still gripped, again could make the PK result part of the equation. These are simply my opinion do not take what I say seriously . lol

Cheers



Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson

View Referee Richard Dawson profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 30979
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>