- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 31135Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 12/28/2016RE: Rec Adult russell of Sydney, Australia asks...Am watching the Spurs v southampton game right now, and Mike Dean has awarded a penalty to Spurs for a shirt pull. We know that a foul that begins out side the box and continues into the box is a penalty. This incident raises the question about how far out as while there was bit of a pull, it was not continuous and there were a number of paces taken (at a running speed) after the pull. The defender was also shown red. Mike Dean is a respected, strong and willing referee, however, these two connected decisions seem harsh. thoughts welcomed. Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Russell This looked like a number of fouls to me. The first tug on the Tottenham player Delle Alli was well outside the penalty area and as it did not do enough to stop the player, play was correctly allowed to continue. As the attacker was about to shoot the Southampton player Nathan Redmond sort of threw himself / fell towards the attacker making contact on the Spurs player Alli just as the player was getting his shot away. As that happened inside the penalty area the correct decision was a penalty kick. As Redmond did not make a genuine effort to play the ball the only possible decision was a dismissal for denying a goal scoring opportunity. So for me Referee Mike a Dean got the call correct under the new interpretation of Law 12. I believe that the fuss was around the fact that the contact appeared innocuous with it looking like the Southampton player falling into the Spurs player. That is still a foul as it is a careless challenge on an opponent. At the highest level player attempt to make such challenges look accidental or a coming together. The Southampton player had no chance of playing the ball yet he still made contact on the Spurs player with the desired effect of making him miss his shot.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Russell, Mike made the decision with complete understanding the defender only played the player never the ball in the lead up to the created collision. Do not have to wipe a guy off the field to cause him to miss. Little nudges are as unfair as a sweep the legs maneuver if they prevent the opportunity. Always a PK easy red card decision! Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 31135
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|