- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 31165Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 1/10/2017RE: Youth Under 17 James of Motherwell, North lanarkshire Scotland asks...A player having made a challenge and is on his knees on the ground, the ball is loose and in the attempt to get control of the ball it ends up at player on his knees who instinctively clamps the ball between his knees. There are opposing players close by and obviously it would be dangerous to attempt to win the ball back, is this not an indirect free kick to the team who want to win the ball back? Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi James As described this could be playing in a dangerous manner (to the player himself) which has an indirect free kick restart. Factors that needs to be considered are 1. How close are the opponents 2. Are the opponents in a position to make a play on the ball 3. How quickly the player can react by getting to his feet to continuing playing the ball. The law is not to prevent skill or from playing the ball on the ground yet rtaher to ensure that opponents can play the ball fairly without risk to the player. Many times that risk is just not there or only there for a split second which does not impinge on play.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi James, I agree with your assessment. As described this COULD very well be grounds for PIADM , a whistle stoppage with an INDFK awarded to the opposition. As mentioned the opposition MUST be adversely affected and the player must arise and continue playing not hover on top for any extended period if there are opponents challenging. I had a very interesting moment in a match between the visiting Mexican team and the German team they were playing when a young fellow on his butt clamped the ball between his ankles and somersaulted to take the ball away from the challenging opponent who was trying to foot spin it out from between his legs. I initially though it was a viable move as the opponent was trying to challenge and the player on the ground was making a realistic effort to retain the ball in play. He was making an effort to get up off the ground trying to legally shield the ball as it is his right to do so given it was within playing distance. Except the player did not release the ball but covered it up by squatting over it , once the somersault was completed as there were now 2 opposition players in close quarters waiting for the release of the ball. I assessed they appeared to have refrained from kicking at the ball between the ankles in the air for fear of contact but I think like me they were a bit stunned at the unusual maneuver for the roll away takeaway of the ball! Although I did award an INDFK for PIADM I did compliment the quick thinking player saying if the other opponent was not there at the other end I might have let it slide! No one disputed the call and all was well. Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Peter Grove Hi James, this does indeed sound a lot like the offence of playing in a dangerous manner (PIADM). As per the description in the Laws, this is: ''any action that, while trying to play the ball, threatens injury to someone (including the player themself) and includes preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury.'' In particular, the actions you describe would appear to fall within the second part of the definition, whereby a nearby opponent is being prevented from playing the ball for fear of injuring the player with the ball between his knees. If you as a referee, decided that this offence had taken place, you would indeed award an indirect free kick to the opponents of the player on the ground. Please note however that this does not mean (as is sometimes mistakenly thought) that it is illegal to play the ball while on the ground. If there are no opponents close by and/or being prevented from playing the ball by the actions of the player in question, there is no offence.
Read other questions answered by Referee Peter Grove
View Referee Peter Grove profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 31165
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|