- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 31299Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 2/26/2017RE: Varsity High School Daniel of Dallas, Texas United States asks...An attacker, free from all other defenders, has only the goalkeeper to beat, who is standing 20 yards from the goal line, just outside the area. The attacker cheekily chips the ball over the goalkeeper, with the intent of retrieving the ball behind the keeper and scoring. The keeper, after being chipped, dives to the feet of the attacker, holding him back from the ball by the ankle (i.e. obvious DOGSO, assuming a goal is not scored). The referee, who sees this foul, also notices that the bouncing chipped ball is rolling slowly toward goal, with no one there to stop it, so he delays his whistle to see if the ball will enter the goal. BEFORE the ball enters the goal, however, the attacker, mad about being held, stomps on the goalkeeper with his free foot (VC). I know that, all other things aside, an 'attempted' or 'failed' DOGSO is a yellow card. Here, though, the attacker fouled before the ball entered the goal, though the keeper fouled him first. My interpretation is that the referee should call the first foul (DFK for attacking team), and then both players receive red. One for DOGSO, one for VC. What are your thoughts? It's a very unfortunate scenario. Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Daniel Yes an unfortunate situation and your interpretation is 100% correct. The only possible decision is to stop play, send off the goalkeeper for denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity, send off the attacker for violent conduct and the restart is a direct feee kick to the attacking team at the location of the holding DOGSO foul.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe Manjone Daniel, You are correct. The Goalkeeper would be disqualified for committing a foul while attempting to deny an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the goal is not scored (12-8-2-d3) and the attacker would be disqualified for Violent Conduct (12--8-2a and 18-1-1-tt). The restart is a direct kick for the attacking team from the point of infraction by the goalkeeper (13-2-1f). I hope that your high school season is going well.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe Manjone
View Referee Joe Manjone profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 31299
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|