- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 32255Law 11 - Offside 2/21/2018RE: Intermediate Under 14 Phil of Tarzana, CA United States asks...This question is a follow up to question 32250 Something referee Jason Wright said brings up question. Suppose the attacker is in an offside position, and a defender has his arms wrapped around the attacker. 1) If the defender does this before the attacker's teammate kicks the ball, there's a foul. Can you play advantage if the attacker gets to the ball? Can you yellow card the defender for a tactical foul? 2) If the defender does this after the attacker's teammate kicks the ball, I realize it would be offside & an indirect free kick for the defenders. However, could you yellow card the defender for an attempt? (It couldn't be a foul because play has stopped, but could/should it be unsporting behavior? 3) If they are simultaneous, do you have to decide which offense is more serious? Thanks in advance, Phil Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson HI Phil, For your 1st question NO! there is NO advantage possible if the receiving team mate was a PIOP . The foul if it was worthy of a DFK or PK then call it if it occurred BEFORE the player WAS restricted as a PIOP. For the 2nd question misconduct is a possibility just not likely unless blatantly reckless and setting a standard or bar for match control For the 3rd. I suppose if it WAS simultaneous you would have to arrive at such a decision but for me unless the foul involved VC or reckless I likely go offside INDFK out particularity if the offside was blatantly obvious.
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Peter Grove Hi Phil, Although the law doesn't directly address your question(s), there were a couple of paragraphs added to the offside law just this year (2017-18 edition) that are partially relevant. Those sections are as follows: ''In situations where: [...] a player in an offside position is moving towards the ball with the intention of playing the ball and is fouled before playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the foul is penalised as it has occurred before the offside offence an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalised as it has occurred before the foul challenge''
As to your specific questions: you can't play advantage because if you do, it means you're allowing play to continue as if the foul didn't happen - and if it didn't happen, the attacker has committed an offside offence. You could caution the defender but only if the actions merited it (reckless foul). It wouldn't be a caution for stopping a promising attack because again, absent the foul the player would have been called offside so there would be no attack to stop. It's the same principle as a player who handles the ball to stop it going into the goal from a throw-in - it's not denying a goal because a goal can't be scored from a throw-in.
On the third one, I agree with the opinion given by ref Dawson.
Read other questions answered by Referee Peter Grove
View Referee Peter Grove profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Phil If the ball is present and within playing distance of both players then the offside has in fact occurred most likely by interfering with an opponent. So that is the offence that is called not the pull back. If the ball is elsewhere it is the foul that is called. Referee Grove has quoted the relevant Law 1. If the ball is not played there is no offside yet and timing is critical. A referee could be early on the whistle for a pull back before there is any offside. If however the ball is played then there is a foul at the ball it is offside that is called so no possible advantage as the defending team has been disadvantaged. Any Disciplinary sanction will depends on the nature of the *foul* contact although it is rare. 2. It depends on the nature of the foul. It cannot be tactical as there is an IDFK against the attacking team. If the foul was reckless then yes a caution is possible. The restart is still an IDFK for offside. 3. Unlikely to be simultaneous and very hard to opine. Did the foul happen before the ball was played by a team mate. I expect the flag to up for offside and that is the decision the referee should make.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 32255
Read other Q & A regarding Law 11 - Offside
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|