- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 35765Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 10/20/2024Petr of Prague, Czech Republic Czech Republic asks...This question is a follow up to question 35760 Perhaps I could have asked more generally like this: The advantage is nullified by the touch of the referee, substitute or outside agent. (The advantage is nullified by something other than the opponent). Does the player who fouled (SPA, careless) before receive a yellow card?
Otherwise, the case from Mr. Dawson's tournament is great :-)
Have a good time. And I hope I'm silent now :-) Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson HI Petr, if there is no advantage then we go back to the original foul, which is SPA, thus a yellow card caution would be shown and the DFK awarded. If it was a DB, AFTER the advantage had in the opinion of the referee been achieved, then no caution, just the DB restart. Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Petr Thanks for the follow up.
As a general comment I say to referees to ask themselves this notional question “Would they send off the player for a second caution in these situations”? There are times when there has to be a judgement call on a card so this question is helpful in my opinion.
So in your example the referee plays advantage on a careless foul that had the potential to stop a promising attack with play continuing and advantage fully realised with the ball then hitting the referee who stops play to give the ball back to the attacking team in possession. What would be the judgement opinion of a decision to caution for the original foul which could have the potential to send the player off?
It is for this reason that the Law book states in a few places **...if the offence was interfering with or stopping a promising attack, the player is not cautioned.**
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 35765
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 35772
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|