- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 14228Law 16 - Goal Kick 10/23/2006RE: Select Under 10 Ken McMahon of Dublin, OH USA asks...The goal kick can be a most dangerous play for the team taking the kick. I have seen a couple of creative ways to try to get out of the situation with a keeper punting the ball.
While the intent seems shady in each case, I am not sure that the LOTG are actually being broken in either case.
Scenario One: Keeper chips a goal kick to the sweeper who is standing just outside the Area. The sweeper heads the ball back to the keeper who scoops up the ball and punts it safely away.
Scenario Two (a bit more creative): Sweeper takes goal kick with the goalie positioned near the top of the box. The sweeper hits the ball on the ground so that it goes past the keeper and just beyond the area. The keeper goes out of the area and retrieves the ball and dribbles it into the Area, scoops up the ball and punts it safely away. Is this ever (always)legal? Is it dependent upon the intent of the kick and/or direction of the kick?
Thank you. Answer provided by Referee Ben Mueller Scenario 1: This is legal provided the ball left penalty area before it was headed.
Scenario 2: This could be considered a deliberate pass back to keeper and an IFk awarded to opponents.
Read other questions answered by Referee Ben Mueller
View Referee Ben Mueller profileAnswer provided by Referee Chuck Fleischer Both scenarios involve getting around teaching the keeper to kick the ball some distance. In Ref Mueller's description of the second scenario he writes of a "pass back", this is a misstatement of what the Law forbids. The Law prohibits the keeper using his hands if the ball is deliberately kicked to him by a team mate. The kick "to" may be in any direction.
A goal kick is dangerous when the ball is kicked to an opponent who is just outside the penalty area. The corrective action is not to kick the ball to an opponent.
Regards,
Read other questions answered by Referee Chuck Fleischer
View Referee Chuck Fleischer profileAnswer provided by Referee Keith Contarino Scenario 1 is ok but if these kids are that skilled I find it hard to believe they can't simply kick the ball as required. 2. That's not going to fly with me. We have a teammate of the keeper deliberately kick the ball to an area where the keeper may collect it. He may dribble it back into his penalty area but he may NOT handle the ball.
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profileAnswer provided by Referee Debbie Hoelscher I personally am sketchy about scenario 1. It would appear that they are trying to circumvent the LOTG. However, it's a tough sell and to the letter, scenario 1 does indeed have merit. Scenario 2 is clearly a keeper infringment of deliberately handling a ball passed to him (or to an area that the keeper can get) in his own PA. As Ref Contarino states, the keeper can dribble that ball back into the PA because the GK restart requirments have been satisfied. The keeper may not pick it up.
Read other questions answered by Referee Debbie Hoelscher
View Referee Debbie Hoelscher profileAnswer provided by Referee Nathan Lacy I would agree that the first scenario seems acceptable and also agree that tactically it makes little sense. The second scenario, however, is not acceptable. There are three factors that are to be considered in such a case: (1) was the ball kicked to the keeper; (2) was the kick deliberate; (3) did the keeper use their hands on the ball. The answer to all three in the second scenario is "yes" and an IFK should be awarded and the keeper dribbling back into the penalty area is not an issue. The above can considered a triangle for which all three sides (parts) must be present in order for the IFK to be awarded: foot, deliberate, hands. All the best,
Read other questions answered by Referee Nathan Lacy
View Referee Nathan Lacy profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 14228
Read other Q & A regarding Law 16 - Goal Kick The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...See Question: 14488
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|