Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 22230

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 10/13/2009

RE: NFHS High School

Tim Mann of Akron, OH USA asks...

This is not so much as an application of law question, as it is a historical one.

Situation: High School JV boys game, two-man system. On the far end from me the ball is in play inside of the penalty area. The keeper comes out and gets a hand on the ball, and is then challenged by an attacking player. The other referee blew the whistle for the challenge since the keeper had possession of the ball with his hands. (Up to this point there is no question.) The coach nearest me (of the attacking team of course) begins yelling that his attacker has just as much right to the ball in the penalty area as the goalkeeper. He then went on to say that in the 'goal box' the keeper has special privileges and cannot be challenged, but he can inside the rest of the penalty area. I told him that was a myth, and that the keeper's special privileges including legally handling, and not being challenged while doing so exist within the entire penalty area. Now, I know I was correct, but was there ever a point in time where the area enclosed by the 6 yard line was there for more than a place to take goal kicks or to move back free kicks on the goal? Thanks.

Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol

Back in the 1996 pre-condensed Laws of the Game we find this indirect free kick offense:
----------------
4. charging the goalkeeper except when he
a. is holding the ball;
b. is obstructing an opponent;
c. has passed outside his goal−area.
----------------
Note that it doesn't say a, b *or* c. Nor does it say a, b *and* c. I'm not sure which conjunction was used. I know way long ago it was considered great fun to charge a goalkeeper holding the ball and force him across the line into the goal.

But that 1996 reference was the last time the goal area counted for anything other than the placement of kicks.

I have no idea if any of this applied to HS rules.



Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol

View Referee Gary Voshol profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 22230
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

The following questions were asked as a follow up to the above question...

See Question: 22385

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>