- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 22385League Specific 10/28/2009RE: Indoor - Rec Other Marv of Bowmanville, Ontario Canada asks...This question is a follow up to question 22230 I read the response by Referee Voshol with great interest. Here in Ontario, Canada the discontinued portion of the LOTG that he references is still present in the Ontario Indoor Soccer Playing Laws!! I do not ever remember a time when it was legal to charge a keeper who had fair possession of the ball (but I do recall my grandfather describing this ancient tactic to me). Can anyone provide any feedback on the following: 1. When did the tactic/practice of charging the keeper who was holding the ball cease to become utilized on the playing field? 2. What was the philosophy? Assuming that all of a,b,and c were required to permit 'charging', was this a method of encouraging the keeper to actually release the ball that existed prior to the implementation of the current '6 second rule'. P.S. I have yet to see a player in any Indoor match charge a keeper who is holding the ball. Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol I first certified using the new and improved Laws in early 1998. The instructor mentioned that if we thought reading the new ones was difficult, we should try the old legalese. I received an electronic copy of the 1996 Laws a few years back, which I keep safely stored for references such as this.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Marv The IDFK for charging fairly when the ball was not present was removed from the Laws of the Game in the great rewrite of 1997/1998. In the season before it was an IDFK if a player charged the goalkeeper except when he a. is holding the ball; b. is obstructing an opponent; c. has passed outside his goal−area. If one goes back far enough in the Laws one finds that the goalkeeper was subject to all sorts of challenges and could be charged into the net with the ball. Indeed many suffered serious injury as a result of very heavy challenges. The Laws were constantly added to and amended to take account of new circumstances. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Fgoalkeeper.htm
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 22385
Read other Q & A regarding League Specific
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|